1954
There isn't anything particularly unusual about this skirt pattern. However, along with the released pleat at the center back to accommodate striding energetically across the greens, the designers have provided an attached "saddle" pocket for your tees, divot tool, and lipstick.
This is somewhat similar to the earlier Pictorial 7559, though in that case, the pocket is detachable.
This pattern doesn't appear to have been used.
Those of us who spent time in the Philadelphia area will probably feel a little nostalgia for the old John Wanamaker department store. By the time I knew Wanamaker's in the 1970s, the sewing department was gone, though only 75 miles upstate, I patronized the yard goods department in little Hess's department store until the late 1980's.
Showing posts with label Vogue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vogue. Show all posts
Friday, June 25, 2010
Friday, November 6, 2009
Vogue 8053 - Hooded Coat or Smock
Late 1930s.
There is something very appealing about the illustration. Our model is having a nice walk in the country on a sunny, blustery day. Her rather more refined older sister is back at the house, arranging flowers for the dining table.
The pattern retailed for forty cents, good value for a garment that can be made up as a smock, jacket, and beach cover-up. Although Vogue is marketing this pattern as "Easy to Make," they still offer you the option of putting in a lining. And if you're not entirely confident of your sewing skills, you can get their sewing book right at the pattern counter.
I picked up my copy for $5.00
Blue chalk smudges are still visible on most of the pattern pieces, though not on the piece for the sleeve band.
If you've not seen vintage sewing patterns before you may be surprised to find that they're unprinted. Vogue is somewhat unusual in perforating the name of the pattern piece - usually only the pattern piece letter or number is given. All perforations have specific meanings, though the meanings aren't necessarily the same from one pattern company to another. Unprinted patterns were produced as late as the early 1950s, even though McCall and Pictorial Review had both offered some printed patterns in the 1920s.
There is something very appealing about the illustration. Our model is having a nice walk in the country on a sunny, blustery day. Her rather more refined older sister is back at the house, arranging flowers for the dining table.
The pattern retailed for forty cents, good value for a garment that can be made up as a smock, jacket, and beach cover-up. Although Vogue is marketing this pattern as "Easy to Make," they still offer you the option of putting in a lining. And if you're not entirely confident of your sewing skills, you can get their sewing book right at the pattern counter.
I picked up my copy for $5.00
Blue chalk smudges are still visible on most of the pattern pieces, though not on the piece for the sleeve band.
If you've not seen vintage sewing patterns before you may be surprised to find that they're unprinted. Vogue is somewhat unusual in perforating the name of the pattern piece - usually only the pattern piece letter or number is given. All perforations have specific meanings, though the meanings aren't necessarily the same from one pattern company to another. Unprinted patterns were produced as late as the early 1950s, even though McCall and Pictorial Review had both offered some printed patterns in the 1920s.
Labels:
1930s,
jacket,
smock,
Vogue,
women's clothes
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Vogue 5770 - Women's Smock
1931
Vogue patterns from this era don't show up very often. Vogue has always marketed itself as a fashion leader, yet the design of the envelope, while perfectly adequate and informative, doesn't have the lovely style that McCall had adopted a few years earlier with their smock.
It's also surprising to see Vogue producing a pattern for a utilitarian garment. But what a wonderful design they've produced! The bound edges provide a very neat finish, as do the bound button holes
The tone of the instructions is that of a careful teacher with very high standards.
Labels:
1930s,
smock,
Vogue,
women's clothes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








